Journal · What the Research Says

Does It Matter When You Have Your Herbal Tea, Morning or Evening?

Does It Matter When You Have Your Herbal Tea, Morning or Evening?

Maybe you started with an evening cup because that is the hour the kitchen finally goes quiet. Then a Saturday arrived, you were up early with nothing on the calendar, and you caught yourself wondering whether the morning version might be the better one. Or you read somewhere that herbs have a "right" hour, said with enough confidence that you began to doubt your own kettle schedule.

I went looking for the research on exactly that. Does the hour you pick for a small ritual matter, and has anyone actually studied it? (Whether a particular herb does anything is a much bigger conversation.)

For herbal tea, almost nobody has. The studies that do exist are mostly about something nearby: what makes people keep up a small daily thing.

What I found when I searched for herbs and the clock

Timing is a real research field for conventional medicines. A 2013 review in the International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy searched three databases covering 2008 to August 2011 and kept 41 human studies on when to give a drug, most of them randomized trials. About two-thirds of them, 27, supported the idea that timing mattered for the drug being tested. The authors still described the field as largely early stage. This was about medicines, not tea, and I read the abstract, not the full text.

For herbs, I found far less. A 2021 study in Frontiers in Pharmacology gave two herbal root extracts to mice once a day for seven days, at two different times of day. The effect differed by dosing time, and the difference disappeared in mice missing a body-clock gene. It is a mouse study, and nothing in it tells a woman what to do with a teapot.

The closest human comparison I found was a 2025 crossover trial in Food & Function. Fourteen healthy adults ate a rice meal with or without green tea extract, once at 8:00 and once at 18:00. Their blood sugar and insulin responses differed between the two times of day whether or not the extract was in the meal, and the extract changed only one early insulin measurement, after the morning meal. That was an extract in a meal, not a cup of tea, and 14 people is too few to build on. I mention it only to show what human data on this looks like.

In the searching I did, I did not find a human trial that compared a morning cup with an evening cup of the same herbal tea. I cannot prove none exists. I can tell you I did not find one.

What the habit research says about time of day

Here the data is richer, though it is about habits in general, not about herbs.

A 2010 study in the European Journal of Social Psychology followed 96 volunteers, mostly university students with an average age of 27, who each picked one small eating, drinking, or activity behavior to repeat in the same setting every day for 12 weeks. The time it took for a behavior to feel automatic ranged from 18 to a projected 254 days, and the figure you may have heard, 66 days, is a central estimate from that spread, not a promise. Missing a single day did not materially change the pattern. It all rested on people rating their own automaticity.

The one that tested time of day head-on was a 2024 randomized study in the Journal of Behavioral Medicine. It assigned 317 young women volunteers (the abstract does not give an age range) to build one of two habits over four weeks: a daily calcium tablet or exercise. Within each, they planned it for the morning, for the evening, for no set time, or received no planning help. The calcium tablet, the simple behavior, stuck best among people who described themselves as morning types and had a morning plan. Exercise stuck best when the planned time matched the person's own preference: morning types planning mornings, evening types planning evenings.

A 2021 analysis in the Annals of Behavioral Medicine looked at 51 adults aged 30 to 70 with type 2 diabetes who took pills twice a day, tracked by electronic pill-bottle caps for about a month. They missed more evening doses than morning ones. But day-to-day variation in the timing of doses, which the authors used as a stand-in for habit strength, did not differ between morning and evening. It was an observational, after-the-fact analysis of existing data, and it concerned prescribed medicine.

Finally, a 2023 observational study in the Journal of Medical Internet Research looked at the usage logs of roughly 15,000 people on a commercial meditation app. People whose sessions leaned toward the morning were more likely to still be going at months six and seven. Steadier timing helped early on but was linked to worse use over the long run. One author sat on the company's scientific advisory board, and the paper says these are associations, not causes.

Where the data conflicts or runs thin

On herbs and timing, the human data is close to empty. What exists is animal work, a 14-person study of an extract, and a field review about conventional medicines. None of it can support a claim that one hour is right for a cup of tea.

On habits, the studies lean toward mornings for simple, repeated acts, but not cleanly. The calcium tablet favored a morning plan for morning types, yet the pill-bottle study found morning doses were missed less without any difference in timing consistency. The app study found regular timing helped at first and hurt later. And exercise, the more complex habit, did best when the hour matched the person.

Few of the people in these studies resemble a woman of 45 to 55 making tea. They were young women, students, adults on prescribed medication, and app users, with a lot of self-reporting. I would not carry any of these numbers over to you without that caveat.

What this can look like in practice

Read together, the studies are not tidy. Mornings came out slightly ahead for simple acts in some of them, and an hour that matched the person helped in others. The 2010 study had people repeat the act in the same setting each day, which is the only hint of pairing a habit with something already happening that I can point to. Missing a day did not undo anything there.

One way to hold that, not a rule: a morning cup can sit beside the kettle you already boil, and an evening cup beside the dishes being done. If you are curious which hour suits you, you could jot down when the ritual happened and how the hour around it felt, without scoring it. A few weeks of that will tell you something about your own days, which no study here can.

What not to do

I would not treat any herb as having a correct hour because a label or a post says so. None of the human research above supports that. I would not read the calcium result as "mornings are better for everything" either. And a ritual that turns into a test you can fail is a worse ritual: in the 2010 study a single missed day did not change the pattern. If you take any medication or have a health condition, a word with your doctor or pharmacist comes before adding an herb at any hour, because some herbs interact with medicines. When you drink it does not change that.

If you want to keep notes

If you do want a place to jot those small notes, my Daily Check-In Journal for Women Over 40 on Etsy is a printable PDF built around one short daily page, with a "weather check" line for how the day went, and no streak counter or checkboxes. You could add the hour of your cup in the margin. A notebook you already own works just as well.

Sources

Kaur G, Phillips C, Wong K, Saini B, 2013. Timing is important in medication administration: a timely review of chronotherapy research. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 35(3):344-358. Review of 41 human studies on timing of conventional drugs (192 articles screened, 2008 to August 2011), mostly randomized trials; 27 supported chronotherapy. Not about herbs. Abstract-level summary read. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-013-9749-0 (PubMed 23329340)

Liu J, Xu H, Zhang L, Wang S, Lu D, Chen M, Wu B, 2021. Chronoeffects of the Herbal Medicines Puerariae radix and Coptidis rhizoma in Mice: A Potential Role of REV-ERBα. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 12:707844. Animal study (mice), oral gavage once daily for 7 days at two times of day; preclinical, direction only. Full text read. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.707844

Sulaimani N, Rosbotham EJ, Warnock R, Polzella L, Judowski R, Nicolotti L, Houghton MJ, Williamson G, Bonham MP, 2025. Time-of-day-dependent effects of a green tea extract on postprandial glycemia and insulinemia in healthy adults. Food & Function. Randomized, double-blind, controlled crossover trial, N=14 healthy adults, meals at 8:00 and 18:00; below the N=30 threshold, so direction only. Abstract-level summary read. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4fo04843a

Lally P, van Jaarsveld CHM, Potts HWW, Wardle J, 2010. How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(6):998-1009. Observational study, 96 volunteers (82 with sufficient data), 12 weeks, mostly university students, mean age about 27; self-reported automaticity. Abstract details confirmed through secondary summaries; the publisher page could not be opened. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.674

Phillips LA, More K, Russell D, Kim HS, 2024. Evaluating the impact of individuals' morningness-eveningness on the effectiveness of a habit-formation intervention for a simple and a complex behavior. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 47:804-818. Randomized study, N=317 young women volunteers, 4 weeks; age range not stated in the abstract. Abstract read. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-024-00503-4 (PubMed 39014034)

Phillips LA, Burns E, Leventhal H, 2021. Time-of-day differences in treatment-related habit strength and adherence. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 55(3):280-285. Observational post hoc analysis, N=51 adults aged 30 to 70 with type 2 diabetes on twice-daily pills, about one month of electronic monitoring. Summary read. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaaa042

Berardi V, Fowers R, Rubin G, Stecher C, 2023. Time of day preferences and daily temporal consistency for predicting the sustained use of a commercial meditation app: longitudinal observational study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25:e42482. Observational study of app usage logs, 14,879 users per the abstract (14,958 per the methods), first 180 days; demographics not reported. Full text read. https://doi.org/10.2196/42482

This is educational content. It is not medical advice and is not a substitute for consultation with a licensed physician. Nothing here is intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease or condition. If you have a health concern, please talk to your doctor.
← More from the journal