Journal · What the Research Says

Does Gratitude Journaling Actually Work, or Does It Wear Off?

You know that moment after the dishes are done, phone in hand out of habit more than curiosity, when some app or someone's reel tells you the fastest way to feel better about your day is to write down three things you're grateful for? Maybe you've tried it. Maybe it lasted four nights and then sat closed on the counter for six weeks, the way a lot of good intentions do around here. I wanted to know whether there's real research behind gratitude journaling, or whether it's an idea that sounds true mostly because it's been repeated so often.

So this week I went looking. There's more here than I expected, including something I didn't see coming: research suggesting the lift from gratitude journaling can wear thin the more often you do it.

What researchers found

Most gratitude-journaling claims trace back to a 2003 paper by psychologists Robert Emmons and Michael McCullough, published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. It's actually three separate experiments run one after another, not a single study.

In the first, 192 college students were assigned to list five things they were grateful for each week, five daily hassles, or five neutral events, for nine weeks. The gratitude group rated their lives more favorably as a whole, felt more optimistic about the coming week, reported fewer physical complaints, and logged noticeably more hours of exercise than the group listing hassles.

In the second, 157 college students did something similar, but the listing happened daily instead of weekly, over two weeks. The gratitude group again reported more positive feeling day to day, though this time the differences in physical symptoms and exercise from the first study didn't show up again, a detail the researchers wrote down straight, not buried. Both of these first two studies were done on college students in their late teens and twenties, not on women in midlife, so I don't want to assume the results carry straight over to a woman my age.

The third study looked at 65 adults living with a chronic neuromuscular disease, ages 22 to 77, with an average age of 49, close to the women reading this. Over 21 days, the group counting blessings daily reported more satisfaction with life, more optimism, more connection to others, and more hours of sleep than the control group. This is the one study of the three where the average age lines up with midlife, though I'll say this plainly: everyone in it was also managing a chronic illness, which is its own separate circumstance from an ordinary healthy Tuesday.

Where it gets complicated

Here's the part worth sitting with before buying a matching notebook. None of the three studies above followed people after the writing stopped, so none of them can tell us whether the better mood holds up, or whether it's gone a year later. That's not really a flaw in the research. It simply isn't what those particular studies were built to measure.

The closer look at whether the effect fades comes from a smaller, more preliminary line of work. Psychologist Sonja Lyubomirsky and colleagues Kennon Sheldon and David Schkade laid out a theory in the Review of General Psychology in 2005 called hedonic adaptation: the idea that almost any positive activity, repeated too often in the same way, gradually loses its emotional charge, the way a favorite song loses something by its fortieth replay in a week. Inside that same paper, they describe a preliminary, unpublished study in which college students counted their blessings either once a week or three times a week for six weeks. The once-a-week group showed a real lift in well-being. The three-times-a-week group didn't. The researchers' own read on it: doing it more often may have made the practice feel routine rather than meaningful, with boredom outpacing benefit.

I want to be honest about the weight of that particular finding. It's one small, unpublished study described inside a review paper, done on college students, with no follow-up checking whether even the once-a-week benefit lasted past six weeks. It points at something real. Hedonic adaptation itself is a well-documented pattern in psychology more broadly. But "doing it too often might backfire" is a lead to keep an eye on here, not a settled fact.

One more piece belongs here, and it's not the flattering one. A 2021 meta-analysis by David Cregg and Jennifer Cheavens, pooling 27 studies and 3,675 participants, found gratitude interventions had a small effect on symptoms of depression and anxiety, both right after the intervention and at a later follow-up. The effect didn't vanish at follow-up. It also didn't grow. It shrank slightly and stayed small the whole way through, which the authors themselves call modest, not the kind of number anyone should build a treatment plan around. I'm including it here because it answers the fading question either way, good news and bad: the good feeling from gratitude practice doesn't reliably disappear once researchers stop watching, but it was never large to begin with, and it isn't evidence that a journal can treat depression or anxiety in the way that word usually means. If either of those is genuinely sitting on you, that's a conversation for a doctor or therapist, not a five-minute list before bed.

What this can look like in practice

Given all that, here's what I'd actually take from it. The most consistent finding across the studies above is a simple one: writing down a small, specific number of things you're grateful for, once a week, seems to move something in how satisfied you feel with your life and how connected you feel to the people in it. Not daily. Not a long list. Five things, once a week, in whatever notebook or note app is already sitting open on the counter.

The "once a week beat three times a week" finding, thin as it is, matches something I've noticed in myself more than once: a ritual repeated too often starts to feel like a box to check, not a moment to actually notice anything. If a daily gratitude habit has quietly turned into that for you, a checkbox instead of a pause, that isn't you failing at it. That might be exactly what the research above is describing.

What I'd skip

I'd skip turning this into a daily obligation with a streak attached to it, since the one study that tested frequency found more often wasn't better. I wouldn't lean on it as a stand-in for real medical or mental health care if something heavier than an ordinary rough patch is going on. None of the research above claims gratitude journaling treats depression or anxiety, and the researchers who study it closest say the same thing outright. And I'd leave out writing the same two safe things every week out of habit, a warm house, a healthy body, since the studies that found the strongest effects had people naming something specific to that particular week, not repeating a script.

This whole stretch of reading left me with a simple appreciation for noticing what's already working instead of chasing the next fix, which is really the idea behind something I put together a while back. If you want to go deeper with that kind of reflection, on paper, at your own pace, I made the Midlife Self-Reflection Workbook for exactly that. It's on Etsy if it would be useful to you.

Sources

Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. Three experiments: Study 1, N=192 analyzed (from 201 enrolled college students, 147 women and 54 men at enrollment), weekly gratitude/hassles/events lists over 9 weeks. Study 2, N=157 analyzed (from 166 enrolled college students, 125 women and 41 men at enrollment), daily lists over 2 weeks. Study 3, N=65 adults with congenital or adult-onset neuromuscular disease, ages 22-77, mean age 49, daily lists over 21 days. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 377-389. Link

Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Peer-reviewed theoretical review describing a preliminary, unpublished 6-week study (Lyubomirsky, Tkach, & Sheldon, 2004) of college students comparing gratitude listing once a week versus three times a week; exact sample size not reported in the review, and long-term sustainability of the effect was not tested. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 111-131. Link

Cregg, D. R., & Cheavens, J. S. (2021). Gratitude interventions: Effective self-help? A meta-analysis of the impact on symptoms of depression and anxiety. Meta-analysis of 27 randomized controlled trials, N=3,675 adult participants pooled (age range and sex distribution not uniformly reported across the included studies, noted here rather than assumed). Effect at post-test g=-0.29; effect at follow-up g=-0.23; both statistically significant and described by the authors as small. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22, 413-445. Link

This is educational content. It is not medical advice and is not a substitute for consultation with a licensed physician. Nothing here is intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease or condition. If you have a health concern, please talk to your doctor.
← More from the journal